Hello, Mommies! Question for you.... as many of you hopefully know by now, the American Academy of Pediatrics is now recommending that starting babies on solids be delayed until 6 months to aid in better digestive development for your little one. So, with that knowledge in mind, Cadence had her first bite of rice cereal exactly on the day she hit 6 months. (Do I earn mommy points for that???) I had hoped to make most of Cadence's baby food myself with my nifty little baby food grinder.... but as you all know, parenting ideals often have to shift out of necessity when you are introduced to what the reality of parenting is actually like. (Major cyber high-five to any mommies reading this who make all their own food!)
According to AAP and our pediatrician, solids should go like this: You wait to start solids until 6 months. Got it. Then you only introduce one new food at a time, allowing 5-7 days in between new foods. Ok. You start with vegetables first, then a month or two later add fruits. Once you've introduced a new food, you keep it in rotation so that your baby doesn't have to eat only carrots for the 5-7 days straight until switching to a new food... I actually knew someone who did this to their baby, and the poor kid's skin turned orange. Bad. So, switch it up between the already introduced foods. Cool.
So, here's the question. Baby food companies LOVE to print age ranges on their products to let you know when it would be "appropriate" to feed that product to your baby. However, their recommendations don't match those of AAP... which of course is a marketing ploy, because the sooner they can convince you that it's safe to give your baby their products, the sooner they start making money off of you.
The baby food jars are made in different amounts of thickness for different "stages." Stage 1 is recommended by Gerber and Beech Nut and every other company for ages 4 months and up. Stage 2 is recommended for ages 6 months and up. So obviously, if I follow the AAP recommendations, I would not follow these age ranges. But I want to know at what point my baby is "behind?" Because in my mind, I don't want to start her on any Stage 2 foods until she's been introduced to all of the Stage 1 foods available, right? And in Stage 1 there are green beans, peas, carrots, squash, sweet potatoes, prunes, apples, pears, peaches, and bananas, plus we're supposed to spend a week or so on introducing rice cereal and oatmeal cereal. That means that we would take about 12 weeks to introduce all of the Stage 1 foods, so if we start at 6 months, we are ready to switch to Stage 2 at 9 months, right? So it's ok for my 8 month and 10 day old to still be on Stage 1 right?
And another thing, the Stage 2 jars are bigger... like twice as much food! Cadence is a little itty bitty girl with an itty bitty stomach... and there are many times when getting her to finish off the end of a Stage 1 jar is difficult. And I really don't want to waste food or my money. So all that being said, I feel like between the AAP and my pediatrician and my own logic, it makes sense to still be on Stage 1.
BUT... other books I've read say that we should be progressing to cheerios and other finger foods around 9 or 10 months, and if we're still on Stage 1 thickness at 8 1/2 months, that's going to be a jump that is too big for her to make that quickly. I know lots of other mommies with babies around the same age as Cadence or even younger who are already on Stage 2 or even Stage 3! I'm so confused.
Really, I'm not expecting any definite answers from anyone, I guess more than anything I just wanted to vent about how much the opinions of doctors vs. AAP vs. Gerber vs. other moms on this matter are so very different, leaving me to feel like someone will always be making me feel like I'm messing up. A little agreement between all involved parties would sure be nice!